This is a web page preview of a Microsoft Word document from the York Liberal Democrats site. It is generated by a computer and is not manually edited. Formatting and content may be displayed differently to the original document, and should not be regarded as definitive.
Media Release from the Liberal Democrats
Press release - Immediate
For further information contact Steve Galloway on York 794111
Grant Settlement for York - LibDem reaction
“Disappointing” is how local Council Leader Steve Galloway describes Thursday's grant distribution announcement by central government.
The announcement confirms that there will be no change to the distribution formulae. York's hopes were pinned on persuading the government that additional costs incurred in the City, for example as a result of high housing prices and the wear and tear caused by 4 million visitors, would be recognised. But hopes have been dashed.
The extra £6.5 million that the City will receive - along with all other authorities - is slightly more than the “worst case” scenario that Council officials have been working on. About £3.8 million of the increase has been ring fenced for education and the rest will be more than taken up by the normal inflation pressures (pay, prices and increased interest charges).
“This leaves us nothing to cover, for example, the extra £1.3 million costs of waste disposal - a cost which is the direct result of a central government decision to impose punitive taxes at landfill sites. So the local taxpayer will be hit again”.
Other major additional - above inflation - costs likely to be incurred by the York Council include:
Costs arising from equal pay legislation
Shortfall in income resulting from the introduction of lower parking charges
Cost of highways materials
Replacement of obsolescent computer equipment (replacing systems no longer supported by suppliers)
Loss of direct grant to Social Services
Increased population of elderly people and those with complex needs.
However, the Council has been very frugal in its use of its contingency fund this year and as a result some could be carried over to help reduce the tax demand in 05/06.
Despite some claims, the Council has had a very successful campaign to encourage less well off residents to take advantage of Council Tax benefits. There are around 7.5% more claimants now than a year ago (one of the reasons for the delays experienced by the Council in dealing with applications earlier in the financial year).
In addition, Liberal Democrat Councillors have been trying to get more eligible pensioners and disabled people to claim attendance allowance. This campaign has been successful and as a result part of the increasing income to the City relates to the higher than average number of residents now claiming this allowance.
Senior members are working with officers to produce a balanced budget. Around £4.5 million in efficiency savings have already been identified. Residents will be consulted before Christmas on the options for dealing with the remaining budget gap of nearly £3 million.
If the Council Tax rise is to be restricted to 5%, then substantial cuts in service quality would be necessary. At 10%, service quality could be maintained. A compromise figure of 7.5% will also be an option for residents to consider.
Steve Galloway said today;
“This settlement does not address the fundamental unfairness of both the Council Tax system - which is not based on people's ability to pay - nor the relatively poor deal that York receives compared to other Cities”.
"Council Tax is a bad tax - unfair and grossly inefficient. M.P.s love talking about how people's homes have increased in value - but ask them about what that means for their council band re-valuation and there is an uncomfortable silence. Revaluation is going to be the New-Labour version of 'wealth re-distribution' from those whose houses go up a band and pay more to those in the top bands who can't go any higher - who ever heard of trickle-up? In York many residents could face a 12 - 25% hike in tax payments simply as a result of revaluation. Some rises could be as high as 40%. When the truth about re-valuation dawns on people, their reaction will be one of horror.
I the meantime we will be redoubling out efforts to get a “Fair Deal for York" and we will leave no stone unturned in our quest for even more efficiency savings”
-------------
Editors note
This year:
York has the 10th lowest Council Tax in the country. It is the lowest outside the south east of England
York receives the 4th lowest grant from central government of any unitary authority in the country
York spends less per head of population than any other Council in the country
York is independently rated by central government as providing “good” quality Council services.
The combination of good service quality and low costs make York one of the 2 most efficient Councils in the country.
Additional Expenditure for 2005/06 faced by Council (unavoidable)
Cost |
£K |
Pay Increase - APT&C (2.95%) |
1,815 |
Pay Increase - Teachers (2.95%) |
146 |
Employers Superannuation shift from 5% to 6% base |
785 |
Price Inflation |
1,220 |
Utility Cost Inflation gas / elec etc.) |
450 |
DfES Minimum Guarantee for Schools |
2,714 |
ITT Development Plan (computer system replacement) |
520 |
Additional Interest Charges on Borrowing (Capital Programme) |
860 |
Additional Running Costs (Capital Programme) |
230 |
One-off Savings taken in 2004/05 |
222 |
Landfill Tax (£3 per tonne) - increase on present volume |
266 |
Inflation on Collection and Disposal costs (Waste) |
150 |
Reduced Rent Income on Harewood Whin |
120 |
Drainage Board Levy |
27 |
Minimum Revenue Provision (Repayment of Principal) |
100 |
Growth Approved in 2004/05 - subsequent years' costs |
323 |
Removal of HRA contribution re rent rebate benefits |
77 |
Total inescapable additional expenditure |
10,025 |
Other new costs faced by Council
|
£K |
Job Evaluation and Equal Pay |
807 |
Waste Management (higher costs of avoiding punitive landfill tax) |
1300 |
Parking - e.g. loss of income through lower (evening) charges |
390 |
Highways Maintenance Additional Inflation |
230 |
Highway Contract - delay to tender |
277 |
Revenue Costs of LTP Capital Programme |
100 |
Prudential Borrowing for Highways Maintenance |
50 |
Additional Winter Maintenance Requirements |
50 |
York Pride customer handling system |
40 |
Public Rights of Way - Mapping and Improvements |
20 |
Licensing of Houses of Multiple Occupation |
60 |
Local Development Framework (replaces Local Plan Enquiry) |
85 |
Additional costs re Fulford Cemetery Extension |
10 |
Housing - Supporting People (reduction in grant) |
650 |
Complex Care Needs - Social Services |
357 |
Increase in cost of Residential and Nursing Placements (private sector) |
413 |
Maintenance of LPSA Investment - adoption |
32 |
Maintenance of LPSA Investment - leaving care |
31 |
Mental Health Grant |
46 |
Asst HR Officer - Community Services |
32 |
Housing Development Co-ordinator (affordable housing) |
27 |
Implementation of Homeless Strategy |
25 |
Private Lease Scheme |
24 |
Additional Resources in Local Tax |
50 |
Ledger Replacement - Project Costs |
120 |
Asbestos - Safety work |
50 |
Inflation on voluntary sector grants budget |
7 |
Zoo Skate Park (Health and Safety manning levels) |
44 |
Home to School Transport |
121 |
Staff Increments |
595 |
Total other budget pressures |
£6.0 Million |
Liberal Democrats - Taking a Pride in York
Page 1 03/12/2004 Y:\xcmcstc\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\Content.IE5\0TM7OTU3\Press release grant settlement[1].doc